Diberdayakan oleh Blogger.

Popular Posts Today

Al Jazeera buys Current TV, will launch new channel

Written By limadu on Kamis, 03 Januari 2013 | 14.44

Al Gore and Joel Hyatt, co-founders of Current TV, have sold the station to Al Jazeera.

HONG KONG (CNNMoney)

The takeover will provide Al Jazeera with access to millions of U.S. households, a lucrative market the Qatar-based broadcaster has long coveted. The deal also means the end of Current, the low-rated channel co-founded by former Vice President Al Gore.

Al Jazeera said it will shutter Current and create a New York-based network. Al Jazeera, which is financed by the government of Qatar, said it plans to expand its presence in the U.S., opening new bureaus and doubling its staff to 300 employees.

"We are proud and pleased that Al Jazeera, the award-winning international news organization, has bought Current TV," Gore and Joel Hyatt, the station's co-founder and CEO, said in a statement released Wednesday.

Current has long struggled to attract an audience in the U.S., emerging in its latest iteration as a left-leaning outfit fashioned in the image of Keith Olbermann, the firebrand host hired -- and then fired -- by the channel.

Al Jazeera's English-language channel is currently available only in select U.S. markets. As of Wednesday, Current reached nearly 60 million households, according to an estimate from the channel's management. Access to Current's distribution channels will boost Al Jazeera's potential audience by millions.

The financial terms of the agreement were not disclosed.

Al Jazeera, ubiquitous in the Middle East, has tried for years to convince cable providers in the United States to add the channel to their lineups. But as the network sought to expand, it became something of a political hot potato, drawing criticism and allegations of bias.

Related: GetGlue acquired by Viggle in social TV merger

Al Jazeera insists that an American audience for the channel exists, saying 40% of online viewing of Al Jazeera English originates in the U.S.

But if Current was acquired to provide access to more households, there were signs of trouble on that front Wednesday, as Time Warner Cable (TWC, Fortune 500) immediately moved to drop Current following the takeover announcement.

"Our agreement with Current has been terminated and we will no longer be carrying the service," the cable provider said in a statement. To top of page

First Published: January 3, 2013: 12:16 AM ET


14.44 | 0 komentar | Read More

Starbucks to open first store in Vietnam

Starbucks will open a store in Ho Chi Minh City in February.

HONG KONG (CNNMoney)

Starbucks will open its first store in Vietnam next month, the Seattle-based coffee behemoth said Thursday.

The store, set to open in Ho Chi Minh City, will be operated Hong Kong Maxim's Group, a heavyweight restaurant player with substantial holdings in the region. Maxim's Group already runs more than 130 Starbucks locations in Hong Kong and Macau.

The expansion comes just months after Starbucks opened its first stores in India, one of the world's largest markets boasting more than a billion potential consumers. As in Vietnam, the Starbucks expansion in India will be completed with a partner -- Tata Global Beverages.

Vietnam has a substantial history with coffee, and some Starbucks beans are already sourced from the country.

"Vietnam is one of the most dynamic and exciting markets in the world and we are proud to add Vietnam as the 12th market across the China and Asia Pacific region," John Culver, president of Starbucks China and Asia Pacific, said in a statement.

Related: Eyeing huge market, Starbucks opens first India store

The move is part of a concerted effort by Starbucks to expand its Asia footprint. The company already has 3,300 stores in the region.

Starbucks currently operates in 61 countries. Vietnam will be number 62.

-- CNN's Pamela Boykoff contributed to this report. To top of page

First Published: January 3, 2013: 12:43 AM ET


14.44 | 0 komentar | Read More

Deficit hawks: Fiscal cliff deal a real downer

Erskine Bowles and Alan Simpson, who co-chaired the president's bipartisan debt reduction commission, said the fiscal cliff deal is "truly a missed opportunity to do something big to reduce our long term fiscal problems."

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

That, in a nutshell, summarizes how independent deficit hawks view the fiscal cliff compromise that Congress passed on Tuesday and which President Obama signed into law Wednesday.

On the bright side, the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 largely averts the economic pain of the scheduled tax hikes and spending cuts in 2013.

"That reduced the probability of a recession quite a bit," said Rudolph Penner, former director of the Congressional Budget Office.

But, Penner quickly noted, "[Congress and the White House] didn't do much else. And they gave us a New Year's Eve present of another cliff in two months."

The bill does not address the country's debt ceiling, which needs to be raised by the end of February or early March. And that debate promises to be "trench warfare," as one analyst put it.

Plus, the bill simply postpones for two months the need to replace the nearly $1 trillion in ill-conceived spending cuts known as the sequester.

Calling it a "missed opportunity," the country's two best known deficit hawks -- Erskine Bowles and Alan Simpson, who co-chaired the president's bipartisan fiscal commission -- weren't overjoyed.

Related: Fiscal cliff deal averts tax hikes but leaves big issues pending

Congress had 17 months to address the cliff, but it didn't start negotiating in earnest until about six weeks ago.

"In fact, Washington politicians set it up to force themselves to seriously deal with our nation's long term fiscal problems. Yet even after taking the country to the brink of economic disaster, Washington still could not forge a common sense bipartisan consensus on a plan that stabilizes the debt," Bowles and Simpson said in a statement.

The bill would reduce deficits by less than $750 billion over a decade but only if compared to a scenario in which all the Bush tax cuts were made permanent and other fiscal cliff measures were canceled. If measured against a scenario in which the fiscal cliff stayed in place permanently, it would add nearly $4 trillion to deficits.

Either way, it doesn't establish a path in which the country's debt would stop growing faster than the economy, the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget noted in its analysis of "the good, the bad and the ugly" in the compromise.

Independent deficit hawks gave up hope awhile ago that lawmakers would work out a detailed "grand bargain" in the context of a fiscal cliff deal.

But they continued to hope that a deal would include a framework for tax and entitlement reform that Congress could pursue in 2013.

Even that didn't happen. And the White House and Congress have both acknowledged more work needs to be done.

Until it is, "policy decisions will continue to be driven by short-term crisis management rather than responsible strategic planning," Robert Bixby, executive director of the Concord Coalition, wrote in a blog post.

What's more, Bixby added, "uncertainty will continue to be a drag on the economy, public frustration with the political process will grow and the debt burden hanging over future generations will remain as our legacy." To top of page

First Published: January 3, 2013: 2:03 AM ET


14.44 | 0 komentar | Read More

Stocks in 2013: Get defensive

Written By limadu on Rabu, 02 Januari 2013 | 14.44

Click chart for more market data

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

According to more than 30 investment strategists and money managers surveyed by CNNMoney, the S&P 500 should finish 2013 at 1,490, up 4.5% for the year. While that's not anything to scoff at, it's a far cry from last year's 13% increase.

Investors are facing a number of headwinds, not the least of which is the ongoing uncertainty out of Washington. But experts are primarily pinning their modest forecasts to a slowdown in earnings growth.

It's that very concern that's made ING Investment Management chief market strategist Doug Cote less of a bull going into 2013.

"I'm not predicting Armageddon, but I do think it will be prudent to take a more defensive position in the market this year," said Cote, who has a 1,515 year-end target for the S&P 500.

Related: Best performing stocks

While Corporate America reported year-over-year earnings growth for 11 straight quarters, that streak was broken during the third quarter of 2012. Overall, Cote expects earnings growth in 2013 to be flat to slightly negative.

"Negative earnings growth is a rare event, and it's a predictor of future negative earnings growth," he said. "This goes beyond the fiscal cliff. It's a signal of a real slowdown in the global economy."

For Cote, that means trimming back on stock exposure and adding to his global bond portfolio.

Related: Full survey results

The slowdown in earnings growth has made Ben Halliburton, chief investment officer at Tradition Capital Market, even more bearish. His 2013 target for the S&P 500 stands at 1,200, down a whopping 16% from the end of 2012.

Halliburton noted that over the past three years, companies have done everything they can to cut costs and improve efficiency, the combination of which has boosted profit margins near record highs.

"Everyone is already working with bare bones," he said. That means any additional weakness in the United States or the broader global economy will have a magnified impact on earnings growth, he added.

Related: Worst performing stocks

Though the majority of experts are forecasting single-digit gains, there are a handful of strategists who are a bit more optimistic.

Ryan Detrick, equity strategist at Schaeffer's Investment Research, is expecting the S&P 500 to rise 15% this year.

While he acknowledges that investors are approaching 2013 with caution and fear, much like they did 2012, he believes the market will continue to ratchet higher, just as it did last year.

"Market pullbacks are to be expected," said Detrick, "But the Dow and S&P 500 will take out their 2007 high in late 2013, as naysayers and underperformers finally buy into the bull market that has been in place since early 2009." To top of page

First Published: January 1, 2013: 10:02 PM ET


14.44 | 0 komentar | Read More

Fiscal cliff deal boosts world markets

Vice President Joe Biden helped broker the Senate bill. Some House Republicans have been quick to express their dislike for the measure.

HONG KONG (CNNMoney)

The Senate passed a compromise measure Tuesday that would extend the Bush-era tax cuts for the vast majority of Americans and spare tens of millions from the Alternative Minimum Tax.

But the deal, crafted over the long weekend by Vice President Joe Biden and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, also required approved by the House. After hours of wrangling and debate, that body finally consented to the plan just before Tuesday expired in the U.S. -- but after markets opened in Asia.

All major global markets were closed Tuesday for the New Year's holiday, so indices in Asia and Australia provided the first clues about investor sentiment.

Australia's ASX All Ordinaries index added 1.2%. South Korea's KOSPI gained 1.5% and the Hang Seng in Hong Kong advanced 1.9%.

Tokyo's Nikkei and the Shanghai Composite remain closed for holiday celebrations, but will reopen later in the week.

Investors in the U.S. will get their first shot at reaction when markets open in New York. U.S. stock futures were pointing to a higher open.

Related: Fiscal Cliff: What's in the deal ... what could have been

While the agreement provides some short-term certainty, it leaves a range of big issues unaddressed.

The bill does not resolve the issue of when and how lawmakers raise the debt ceiling, setting up a major showdown in February.

The legislation also creates a new cliff deadline over spending cuts around the same time the debt ceiling will need to be raised.

And tax and entitlement reform, both are key to long-term deficit reduction, are not included in the compromise proposal.

Todd Schoenberger, managing partner at LandColt Capital, said that the immediate reaction on Wall Street will be "positive," but cautioned that the economy still faces significant challenges.

"Considering there are so many headwinds facing the economy, including the debt ceiling negotiation in 60 days, the smart money knows the bullish sentiment will be short-lived," he said. To top of page

First Published: January 1, 2013: 8:06 PM ET


14.44 | 0 komentar | Read More

Fiscal cliff deal would hit the rich - but it could have been worse

The House must still vote on the fiscal cliff deal, which hits the rich.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

Those making a million and up will pay $122,560 more in federal taxes, on average, according to new estimates by the Tax Policy Center. That means this group, which includes those bringing home many millions of dollars, will see a 5.7% drop in after-tax income.

Those with comparatively paltry incomes of between half a million and a million bucks will pay nearly $7,000 more in federal taxes, and see a 1.4% drop in after-tax income.

Less than 1% -- actually only 0.7% -- of tax filers overall will see a tax increase. Everyone else, including a wider swath of the middle class, will be virtually unaffected, though all wage earners will see a 2 point increase in the payroll tax that goes toward Social Security.

"It's profoundly a compromise," said Clint Stretch, a Washington tax expert. "We have a new definition of the middle class that seems to include virtually everybody."

The agreement, approved late Tuesday by the House, calls for the top rate on joint filers earning more than $450,000 to return to 39.6%, up from the 35% rate in place since the Bush tax cuts of 2001.

These folks will also pay a top rate on dividends and long-term capital gains of 20%, up from 15%.

Upper-income Americans will also enjoy fewer tax deductions. Married couples earning more than $300,000 will see their itemized deductions and personal exemption phase out. Couples earning more than $422,500 will not be able to take a personal exemption at all.

Also, estates of more than $5 million will be subject to a top tax rate of 40%, up from 35% now.

And this doesn't include two new taxes that will hit the rich to pay for President Obama's health reform package, including a 0.9% tax on earnings above $250,000 for couples and an additional 3.8% levy on investment income for wealthy filers.

Related: Fiscal Cliff: What's in the deal ... what could have been

But it could have been even worse for the rich.

For one thing, more people could have been classified as wealthy. Obama and Democratic policy leaders were originally looking to raise rates on filers with incomes above $250,000.

The higher threshold would helps the rich too since a smaller share of their income will be subject to the highest tax rate.

Another concession for the rich in the Senate deal is the rate on dividends. They will be subject to a top rate of only 20%, rather than 39.6%. This is especially important since a substantial portion of wealthy household's income comes from investments. To top of page

First Published: January 1, 2013: 5:59 PM ET


14.44 | 0 komentar | Read More

Senate bill stops many tax hikes, but leaves big issues pending

Written By limadu on Selasa, 01 Januari 2013 | 14.44

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

Most prominently, it would extend the Bush-era tax cuts for the vast majority of Americans and spare tens of millions from the Alternative Minimum Tax.

But the deal, crafted over the long weekend by Vice President Joe Biden and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, still must be approved by the House.

And while it would provide some short-term certainty, it would leave a range of big issues unaddressed.

For instance, when and how will lawmakers raise the country's debt ceiling? From all indications, the coming fight in February could be ugly.

The legislation also creates a new cliff deadline over spending cuts around the same time the debt ceiling will need to be raised.

And what about real tax and entitlement reform? Both are key to long-term deficit reduction, but neither are included in the compromise proposal.

Instead, according to sources familiar with the deal and the text of the bill, the Biden-McConnell compromise would:

Make most Bush tax cuts permanent: The Bush-era income tax rates would be permanently extended for all income up to $400,000 ($450,000 if married). Bush tax cuts that apply to income above those levels would expire.

Effectively that means for households above those thresholds, their top rate would rise to 39.6%, up from 35% in 2012.

Plus, the capital gains and dividend tax rates for these high-income households would increase to 20% from 15%. For everyone else, investment tax rates would remain at 15% or below.

The compromise bill would also preserve the expanded parameters for the American Opportunity Tax Credit, the Child Tax Credit and Earned Income Tax Credit for 5 more years.

Permanently protect the middle class from the AMT: The bill would permanently adjust the income exemption levels for the Alternative Minimum Tax for inflation.

Most immediately, the measure would prevent close to 30 million middle-class taxpayers from having to pay the so-called wealth tax for 2012.

Without a patch for 2012 in place soon, the IRS has warned lawmakers that up to 100 million taxpayers may not be able to file their 2012 taxes until late March and their refunds would be delayed.

Passing an AMT patch with an extension of the Bush tax cuts on most income -- which together make up the biggest piece of the fiscal cliff -- would boost real GDP by about 1.25% in fiscal year 2013, according to earlier Congressional Budget Office estimates.

Cap itemized deductions on high-income households: The Biden-McConnell compromise would cap how much those making $250,000 (married couples making $300,000) may take in itemized deductions.

Retain key tax incentives for businesses: The bill would extend for two years several tax breaks for businesses, including a production tax credit for developers of wind projects, the research and development tax credit, and a measure allowing for bonus depreciation.

Retains several expired tax breaks for individuals: The compromise bill would extend for one or two years a few "temporary" tax breaks for individuals that regularly are extended. These include an option to deduct state and local sales taxes in place of state and local income taxes; and a deduction for elementary and secondary school teachers for certain expenses.

Permanently extend a more lenient estate tax: The legislation would preserve the current estate tax exemption level of $5.12 million but index it to inflation for future years. And it would raise the top rate to 40% from 35% currently.

If the deal is not approved, the estate tax bite would be much bigger because the exemption level is scheduled to fall to $1 million and the top rate would rise to 55%.

Extend benefits for the long-term unemployed: The bill would continue a federal extension of unemployment benefits for one year.

Without it, more than 2 million of the long-term unemployed would run out of benefits at the end of this year, according to the National Employment Law Project, an advocacy group.

Continuing the benefit extension for one year would cost an estimated $30 billion.

Prevent a cut in Medicare doctors' pay: The Biden-McConnell compromise would prevent a scheduled 27% cut in reimbursement for Medicare services for one year. The so-called "doc fix" would boost the deficit by $31 billion.

Replace sequester for 2 months: The dreaded sequester -- the automatic and blunt spending cuts to defense and nondefense programs -- would be replaced for two months in 2013.

The two months of cuts would be replaced by $12 billion in new revenue and $12 billion in spending cuts.

It's not clear what Congress will decide to do about the sequester after the two months are up. If left in place for the whole year, the sequester would have reduced spending authority in 2013 by roughly $110 billion. To top of page

First Published: January 1, 2013: 2:26 AM ET


14.44 | 0 komentar | Read More

Families worried about their tax credits

The Shivers family stands to lose thousands of dollars worth of tax credits next year unless Congress takes action.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

Charlie and Jessica Shivers currently receive a Child Tax Credit of about $1,000 for each of their two children. But if Congress fails to extend the credit as it stands, that will drop to no more than $500 each.

And it doesn't stop there. Jessica works as a stay-at-home mom. But Charlie, a federal employee, earns about $84,000 so has received an annual $1,700 boost from the payroll tax cut passed in 2010. But that extra money is likely to disappear because Congress is not expected to extend the tax cut.

Many families like the Shivers could also end up worse off by hundreds or thousands of dollars next year if a deal to avert the fiscal cliff isn't reached.

Four of the biggest tax breaks for families on the chopping block are the Child Tax Credit, Earned Income Tax Credit, Child and Dependent Care Credit and the American Opportunity Credit. All are scheduled to revert to lower levels with the start of the new year.

Meanwhile, the expiration of the payroll tax cut would cause paychecks to shrink for 160 million working Americans, regardless of whether they have children.

Related: Parents await fate of four key tax breaks

The bill passed by the Senate early Tuesday would extend three of these credits, but the legislation still must be approved by the House.

For the Shivers, losing $2,700 would mean a cutback in spending. They would delay home improvements, take fewer road trips to see their family and eat out less often.

"As far as being a consumer, we're going to cut back significantly," he said.

It would also stunt the progress they've made paying off their student loan debt, and they wouldn't be able to put as much money into retirement and college savings.

The tax hit wouldn't be "the difference between putting food on the table or not," but it would definitely "still hurt", said Charlie.

Related: Why your paycheck will shrink, no matter what

Another parent, Linda Sadlouskos, is frustrated that she may not be able to take advantage of the American Opportunity Tax Credit, which is scheduled to revert to the Hope Credit and drop from a maximum of $2,500 to $1,800. It would also no longer be refundable, and it would be available for only two years rather than four.

Her son is attending the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey this year, and she makes too much to qualify for need-based grants.

"My family income is too high for him to have ever qualified for any outright grants, so this is the only form of assistance we would receive toward his education," she said. "Since I'm a single mom trying to get him his education, every bit helps, because we're on a pretty tight budget."

But most of all, she said it's "unforgivable" that Congress can't get its act together and that parents like her have been left not knowing what to expect going into the new year.

"It seems really callous of all of our lawmakers to be leaving us hanging on New Year's like this," she said. "This is no way to treat the public." To top of page

First Published: December 31, 2012: 6:31 PM ET


14.44 | 0 komentar | Read More

3 more fiscal cliffs loom

If Congress passes the fiscal cliff deal at hand, lawmakers will face three more budget deadlines over the next three months. Get ready for the debt ceiling, the sequester part II and the continuing resolution.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

That's what's in store if Congress adopts the deal under consideration. The bill approved by the Senate early Tuesday doesn't address the debt ceiling and temporarily puts off most of the automatic spending cuts otherwise set to take effect Wednesday.

Assuming it passes the Senate and House, here is what's still ahead:

1. Debt Ceiling: Congress has to raise the debt ceiling soon. Real soon.

On Monday, Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner made it official: Federal borrowing has reached the $16.394 trillion debt ceiling.

The Treasury Department, which runs the government's debt-issuance operation, can create about $200 billion of headroom by employing what it calls "extraordinary measures." That normally could cover about two months' worth of borrowing, although continuing uncertainty about tax rates and spending make it hard to determine precisely how long the extraordinary measures will last.

Deadline: Late February or early March.

What's at stake: Last year, political brinksmanship over the debt limit led to the downgrade of the country's credit rating, roiled stock markets and raised questions about the country's willingness to pay all of its bills on time. It also wasted $1.3 billion because of the uncertainty it wrought on the complex task of federal borrowing.

2. Sequester: The so-called sequester is a series of automatic cuts in federal spending that will reduce the budgets of most agencies and programs by 8% to 10%.

The cuts were born of the epic 2011 fight over the debt ceiling. The idea was to create a "trigger" so onerous and indiscriminate that both parties would have an incentive to devise a smarter way to reduce deficits. Instead, 17 months later, Congress is considering a deal that would set up yet another deadline.

Deadline: Bill would postpone many of the Jan. 2 cuts by two months.

What's at stake: The spending cuts as laid out in 2011 would ripple out across thousands of federal programs and projects and, the White House budget office said in September, "would have a devastating impact on important defense and nondefense programs."

3. Continuing Budget Resolution: The federal government works on a fiscal year that starts every Oct. 1. Problem is it has been years since it actually enacted a real budget on time.

There's a process for enacting a budget: Congressional committees are supposed to hold hearings. Experts and interested parties testify about proposals. Lawmakers deliberate over the right spending levels for each federal agency and then roll it all up into a budget.

But Congress rarely ends up following that process. Instead, it usually passes short-term "continuing resolutions," which is fancy way of saying "Band Aid solution."

Deadline: The current continuing resolution expires on March 27.

What's at stake: Congress will have to pass yet another continuing resolution to avoid a temporary shutdown of some government functions, worker furloughs and a pullback in programs. To top of page

First Published: December 31, 2012: 11:09 PM ET


14.44 | 0 komentar | Read More

What if there's no deal on fiscal cliff

Written By limadu on Senin, 31 Desember 2012 | 14.44

Failure by Congress to avert the tax increases and spending cuts will cause continued uncertainty and headaches for consumers and businesses about paychecks, tax returns, investments and more.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

Practically speaking, they likely have a "grace period" of a couple of weeks to pass a bill that wards off the bulk of scheduled tax increases and spending cuts without causing too much damage. But there's no guarantee that they'd be able to forge an agreement quickly.

That means Americans would be living with continued uncertainty about tax and spending policies for an indefinite period in 2013.

And that uncertainty is likely to create problems for tax filers, payroll processors, wage earners, doctors, federal contractors, federal agencies, federal workers and the unemployed -- to name just a few. They are the ones who will pay an increasing price as lawmakers try to redeem themselves and come up with a deal in January or February.

Your paycheck: If you'll be paid in the coming week, your company's payroll processor probably already cut your check. And since the IRS hasn't told the payroll companies yet how much tax to withhold for 2013, they used 2012 withholding rates.

So in that sense, your paycheck in early January won't be much different than what it was in December.

But your paycheck still will be smaller, because the 2% payroll tax holiday is expiring. Starting in January, workers will once again have 6.2% of their wages up to $113,700 withheld to pay for Social Security, up from the 4.2% rate that's been in effect for the past two years.

Effectively that means someone making $50,000 might get about $83 less a month in their paychecks. Someone making twice that would see their pay reduced by roughly $167 a month.

If you're getting a bonus, you'll have more withheld there, too, said Michael O'Toole, senior director of government relations for the American Payroll Association. That's because there's one supplemental withholding rate that applies to bonuses. This year it's 25%, but it's set to rise to 28% on Jan. 1, unless Congress decides to change it.

For paychecks that will be cut during the second, third and fourth weeks of January, payroll processors will follow withholding guidance that the IRS has said it will issue by the end of the year.

If there is no fiscal cliff deal in the next day, and the IRS advises payroll processors to follow 2013 law, paychecks will get smaller because they will have more withheld.

There has been some debate whether Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner has the authority to instruct employers to continue using 2012 withholding tables until further notice. If he does step in, the income tax withheld from paychecks processed in January would not go up.

Such a strategy runs the risk, however, that many wage earners, if not all, could end up being underwithheld for the year. That would be the case if Congress doesn't end up doing anything to avert the cliff in 2013 or lets the Bush-era rates go up on income above a certain threshold.

Your 401(k) and IRA: There's no telling how markets will respond if fiscal cliff gridlock persists.

They had been relatively sanguine. But in the past week, stocks have closed down every day.

Some believe, however, that markets may not move too much on fiscal cliff news -- whether Congress cuts a deal soon or not.

Your 2012 tax return: Here's where things potentially become a dumb mess.

The IRS warned lawmakers that if they don't act to protect the middle class from having to pay the Alternative Minimum Tax for tax year 2012 by Dec. 31, up to 100 million taxpayers may not be able to file their 2012 taxes until late March.

That would mean their refunds will be delayed. And they wouldn't be injecting those refunds into the economy during the first quarter.

Based on Treasury Department records from the past three years, refunds paid during January, February and March combined have ranged from $117 billion to $136 billion.

Government spending: Unless lawmakers avert the so-called sequester, a series of automatic cuts will reduce the budgets of most federal agencies and programs by 8% to 10%.

But that doesn't necessarily mean those cuts would have to occur immediately, according to a former official with the Office of Management and Budget.

Both the White House budget office and federal agencies themselves will have some latitude to postpone the cuts from occurring "for several weeks if necessary," added OMB Watch, a group that monitors the federal budget.

The cuts, if not reversed, would likely lead to unpaid furloughs of federal workers. Agencies must give at least 30 days' notice to employees for a furlough that would last less than 22 work days; 60 days' notice is required for longer furloughs. So far, federal workers have been told to report to work as scheduled on Jan. 2, the day the spending cuts formally kick in.

U.S. economy: Economists expect the U.S. economy would fall into a recession if Congress does nothing to avert the fiscal cliff and lets it stay in effect.

Specifically, the CBO forecasts a drop of 0.5% in real gross domestic product and a 9.1% unemployment rate by the end of next year.

On the bright side, no one expects that Congress would let all fiscal cliff measures have their way with the economy for an extended period.

But there could still be an economic hit if lawmakers push the country over the fiscal cliff temporarily and then pass a fallback deal that primarily averts just some of the tax increases.

For example, Congress may end up passing only a stopgap measure that does not address the automatic spending cuts or raise the country's debt ceiling. In that case, economic growth could be dragged down somewhat in the first half of next year, according to economists at Goldman Sachs.

And remember that the economy is already going to be dragged back somewhat by the expected expiration of the payroll tax cut.

Unemployment benefits: A federal extension of unemployment benefits is set to expire. If Congress does not renew it, workers who lost their jobs after July 1, 2012, will only receive up to 26 weeks in state unemployment benefits, down from as many as 73 weeks in state and federal benefits that have been available in 2012.

As a result, more than 2 million of the long-term unemployed will run out of benefits at the end of this year, according to the National Employment Law Project, an advocacy group.

And another 1 million workers will exhaust their 26 weeks in the first quarter of next year and will not be able to sign up for the federal extension.

If Congress chooses early next year to keep the extension in place, and makes the extension retroactive, many of the 2 million who fell off the rolls may be paid retroactively, said Rick McHugh, a NELP staff attorney.

Doctors' pay: Medicare physicians are facing a nearly 27% cut in their payments for treating Medicare patients because Congress has failed to pass the so-called doc fix to override that scheduled cut, as they usually do.

But here again there may be a few weeks' grace period for Congress to change its mind and reverse the cut. That's because claims are held for at least two weeks before they are paid. To top of page

First Published: December 30, 2012: 7:17 PM ET


14.44 | 0 komentar | Read More
techieblogger.com Techie Blogger Techie Blogger