Diberdayakan oleh Blogger.

Popular Posts Today

Obamas' income drops 21% to $481,098

Written By limadu on Sabtu, 12 April 2014 | 14.44

obamas tax return

Like a lot of high-income Americans, the Obamas were subject to an additional Medicare tax to help pay for the president's signature health reform law.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

The bulk of their income came from the president's salary, but the Obamas also reported roughly $100,000 in business income from Random House and literary management company Dystel & Goderich.

The White House released the couple's 2013 federal tax return on Friday.

Their federal tax bill for 2013 came to $98,169, according to their return. That's an effective federal tax rate of 20.4% on the First Family's AGI.

But because they already paid $117,277 in federal taxes, they're due a big refund of $19,108. They opted to have it applied to their 2014 taxes.

Related: 4 ways the rich will pay more in taxes

Like a lot of very high-income Americans, the Obamas were subject for the first time to the additional Medicare tax that went into effect in 2013 to help pay for the president's signature health reform law.

The extra tax cost them an additional $2,310.

They also owed $136 in additional Medicare taxes on $3,578 in net investment income. Also as a result of Obamacare, net investment income is now subject to a 3.8% Medicare tax for people making more than $250,000.

And like roughly a third of all U.S. tax filers, the Obamas are itemizers. They claimed $147,769 in itemized deductions, the biggest of which was $59,251 in charitable contributions to organizations such as the Fisher House Foundation, American Red Cross and CARE.

A distant second was $42,383 deduction in mortgage interest.

Unlike a lot of Americans, the Obamas put aside a lot for their retirement, saving $20,681 in tax-advantaged retirement plans. To top of page

First Published: April 11, 2014: 5:26 PM ET


14.44 | 0 komentar | Read More

Lawmakers release 250,000 GM recall documents

mary barra email

CEO Mary Barra's name appears on just one of the documents made public Friday, but GM says the email is unrelated to the ignition switch recall.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

Just one email released by the committee has GM CEO, Mary Barra's name on it. It discusses steering problems in Cobalts and Ions and was sent to her in 2011, before she became CEO.

The email didn't mention the ignition switch problem that sparked this year's massive recalls. Barra testified that she did not know the issue was even being investigated within GM until December of 2013. The recall was first ordered on January 31.

GM spokesman Alan Adler told CNNMoney Friday that the email has nothing to do with the ignition switch recall and "in no way contradicts Ms. Barra's previous statements."

The committee requested the documents as it tries to find out why it took GM more than a decade to recall 2.6 million vehicles with a defective part that lets the car sometimes shut off while being driven.

Related: GM finds new ignition flaw, will replace second part

Some of the GM documents show communication about investigations into why airbags were failing to deploy in some Cobalt accidents. Others show discussions about steering problems with some GM models. The documents also include memos from Delphi, the maker of the ignition switch, which we now know was flawed.

"These initial documents revealed failures within the system," said House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Fred Upton in a prepared statement.

The document dump comes less than two weeks after the committee heard testimony from Barra and David Friedman, the head of the government's auto safety agency.

Officials are also looking closely at the way the safety agency, The National Highway Traffic and Safety Agency, oversaw GM's recall.

One email dated July 24, 2013, indicates that at least one person at the agency thought GM was "slow to communicate" and "slow to act."

A subsequent email from Mike Robinson, GM's vice president of sustainability and global regulatory affairs, says that he hopes the agency as a whole does not have that view.

"We worked way too hard to earn a reputation as the best and we are not going to let that slide," Robinson wrote.

NHTSA could not be immediately reached for comment.

The House committee's investigation is ongoing. It is still receiving documents from GM (GM, Fortune 500), a spokeswoman said. To top of page

First Published: April 11, 2014: 7:18 PM ET


14.44 | 0 komentar | Read More

Stocks: Let's put the volatility in context

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

Consider this: We've already had roughly twice as many "big market swing" days -- when the Nasdaq, the S&P 500, and the Dow close 1% (or more) higher or lower -- than we did at the same point a year ago.

The market is always going to have some bumps along the way, but a lot of substantial jumps tend to coincide with really bad years for people who invest in stocks.

Last year was a dream for investors. The markets gained almost 30% in 2013. So far this year, stocks are down.

The Nasdaq has slid over 4%, the Dow over 3%, and the S&P more than 1.5%.

Ryan Detrick of Schaeffer's Investment Research thinks the volatility confirms that while we're not out of the bull market, we're at least on pause.

"Bull markets don't come with a lot of volatility. Historically speaking, a lot of volatility does not lead to big up moves," he said.

He's absolutely right.

If you look at two periods that were especially rough years for investors: 2008 (financial crisis) and 2000 (Dot.com bust), you can see that volatility doesn't bode well for the bull.

Detrick's team predicts that given the volatility we've seen so far this year, 2014 should turn out to be twice as volatile as 2013.

That means the "big market swing" day count could look something like this at the end of the year: Nasdaq: 77, S&P: 55, and Dow: 51.

When you look at these numbers compared with the amount of 1% or more daily moves we saw in 2000 and 2008, it doesn't seem so bad, does it?

To top of page

First Published: April 11, 2014: 6:26 PM ET


14.44 | 0 komentar | Read More

T-Mobile to sell 4G iPad at Wi-Fi price

Written By limadu on Jumat, 11 April 2014 | 14.44

tmobile storefront tablet

T-Mobile calls its new promotion "a full-on assault against the restrictions and pain points that keep tablet owners from experiencing life beyond the Wi-Fi zone."

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

Starting Saturday, the carrier will begin selling 4G-enabled iPads for the same price as Wi-Fi-only models. Rival carriers typically charge $130 extra for 4G devices.

As part of the promotion, which T-Mobile (TMUS) termed "Operation Tablet Freedom," the company is offering customers around 1.2 gigabytes of free 4G LTE data each month for the rest of the year. In 2015, tablet data plans will start at $10 a month when purchased along with voice service. 4G-enabled tablets from Samsung and Google (GOOG, Fortune 500) will also sell at a discount.

T-Mobile CEO John Legrere has termed his company "the Un-carrier" because of its push to upset traditional practices in the wireless industry, like long-term contracts. In a blog post Thursday, he called the status quo for tablets "broken," with customers locked into high priced data plans or forced to search for Wi-Fi networks.

"This is what the Un-carrier does. We solve the problem and force broken systems to change," Legere wrote.

Related: T-Mobile no longer selling BlackBerry

Legere termed T-Mobile's big rivals in wireless -- AT&T (T, Fortune 500), Verizon (VZ, Fortune 500) and Sprint (S, Fortune 500) -- "Big Blue," "Bad Red" and "Bumbling Yellow." He branded them "stumbling" and "arrogant."

"They're more about charging you overages on your data to maximize their profit -- and impose more pain," Legere said.

Since the beginning of last year, T-Mobile has been ramping up pressure on its competitors by eliminating contracts, dropping international roaming charges and offering to pay competitors' customers $650 to switch.

The big boys are already feeling the pressure. AT&T has cut prices and recently offered T-Mobile customers $450 to switch. Sprint and Verizon have also cut prices in response to T-Mobile's campaign, and all three have begun moving away from two-year contracts.

But it's unclear how long T-Mobile can keep up the fight. The rebel approach earned it 1.6 million new subscribers in the fourth quarter of 2013, but the company posted a $20 million loss. To top of page

First Published: April 10, 2014: 5:01 PM ET


14.44 | 0 komentar | Read More

Amazon buys digital comics app comiXology

amazon acquires comixology

ComiXology CEO David Steinberger said Amazon "has shown a passion for reinventing the reading experience."

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

The company announced plans Thursday to buy comiXology, which offers a digital platform for buying and reading comics and graphic novels. The New York Times has called comiXology "the iTunes of comic books."

The companies didn't disclose the terms of the deal.

ComiXology says it was the highest-grossing non-game iPad app last year; it's also available for iPhone, Android, Windows 8 and Amazon's own Kindle Fire. The app features comics from over 75 publishers as well as independent authors, and earns money from sales commissions.

"Amazon and comiXology share a passion for reinventing reading in a digital world," Amazon (AMZN, Fortune 500) vice president David Naggar said in a statement. "We look forward to investing in the business, growing the team, and together, bringing comics and graphic novels to even more readers." To top of page

First Published: April 10, 2014: 7:30 PM ET


14.44 | 0 komentar | Read More

Minnesota to increase minimum wage

minnesota state

The Minnesota legislature approved a minimum wage hike Thursday.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

State legislators on Thursday approved the increase, which will raise the minimum wage level in phases until it reaches $9.50 in 2016 for some businesses. Lawmakers expect Gov. Mark Dayton to sign the bill into law on Monday.

The bill does not bind all employers to the same minimum pay rate.

Those with gross sales of at least $500,000, must pay employees at least $8 hourly in August, $9 the following August and $9.50 by August 2016.

Some smaller employers who are exempt from certain federal labor laws can pay a lower rate. That will increase to $6.50 hourly in August, $7.25 the following year, and then $7.75 a year later.

Related: Minimum wage by state

The minimum wage will also be set at $7.25 for workers at larger businesses if they are under the age of 18 and as a temporary training wage for those 19 and 20 years old. That rate is also the federal minimum.

Beginning in 2018, the minimum wage will be tied to inflation.

President Barack Obama has been pushing states, cities and counties to raise the minimum wage and commended the Minnesota legislature.

"I urge Congress to follow Minnesota's lead, raise the federal minimum wage, and lift wages for 28 million Americans," he said in a prepared statement.

Both Maryland and Connecticut state legislatures recently approved minimum wage hikes to $10.10. To top of page

First Published: April 10, 2014: 7:49 PM ET


14.44 | 0 komentar | Read More

Whole Foods takes over America

Written By limadu on Kamis, 10 April 2014 | 14.44

(Fortune)

Detroit's financial affairs and its struggling population (42% live below the poverty line) make the city an unlikely spot for the upscale grocer. But if not for the local touches -- the lights over the checkout lines are made from repurposed Motown records and the walls are decorated with murals by Detroit artists -- you'd be hard-pressed to distinguish the store from any of Whole Foods' 374 other locations. It has the same overwhelming variety -- 19 types of honey, 13 kinds of chicken or turkey sausage -- and dizzying range of products. If you have $20 to spare, you can buy a "conventional" (industry-speak for nonorganic) bonsai plant or cough up $22.99 for acai powder. The more cost conscious can find a can of cannellini beans or a one-pound bag of pasta for under a dollar.

Translation: Whole Foods didn't alter or dumb down its formula for Detroit, and why should it? The Austin-based chain is one of the country's most successful retailers -- its revenue has doubled and profits have tripled since 2007 -- defying dismal grocery industry trends by offering consumers a mix of organics, truly delicious prepared foods, and an expanding array of staples under its 365 house brand. Now, having conquered affluent suburbs and trendy urban areas, Whole Foods is out to win over the rest of America, setting up shop in previously unthinkable places such as Detroit and Boise, and opening multiple locations in existing markets both large (San Francisco and Manhattan each have seven) and small (two apiece in Tulsa and West Hartford, Conn.).

This may come as a surprise to those who still think of the retailer as "Whole Paycheck," an overpriced natural-food haven for yoga-practicing, juice-cleansing Prius drivers or hipsters obsessed with artisanal baking soda. And while Whole Foods' prices are rarely the cheapest in town -- and, yes, you may very well run into a Lululemon-clad hybrid driver in the checkout line -- it's appealing to a wider array of shoppers than ever before. When Whole Foods went public in 1992 with 10 stores, co-founder and co-CEO John Mackey thought perhaps the chain could open 100 locations, and even that goal, he tells Fortune, was "outlandishly optimistic." In December he upped Whole Foods' projected U.S. store count to 1,200, from an earlier plan of 1,000. (The company also operates stores in Canada and the U.K.)

Whole Foods' vision is a bold gambit when you consider the state of its competition. Supermarkets lost 10 points of share between 2001 and 2013 to the slew of nontraditional players that have gotten into the food game, according to Nielsen. (The erosion finally has started to slow.) Wal-Mart (WMT, Fortune 500), for example, calls itself the nation's largest grocer, with $156.5 billion in its U.S. division's sales coming from grocery, up from $137.8 billion in fiscal 2010. Whole Foods, with $12.9 billion in sales, is tiny by comparison, but it's had an outsize impact on the industry and defied the headwinds facing its brethren by dominating in the food category that's growing -- one that, not coincidentally, it helped create. Healthy, organic, and natural products, a segment few know better than Whole Foods, make up an estimated $150 billion market that's expected to grow by about 50% by 2018, according to industry tracker Penton's Next division. "They're a leading national authority on health and nutrition," says BB&T Capital Markets analyst Andrew Wolf, "and unequivocally the leading retailer on the link between food and health." That lead has translated into healthy stock market gains: The share price is up about 12-fold since its November 2008 recession-era low, vs. 130% for the S&P. Amazingly, much of the senior team leading the corporation has worked together or known each other since the company's early days.

Whole Foods has borrowed from the playbook of traditional supermarkets while avoiding their pitfalls. It's built out a successful, value-oriented private-label program but has maintained a stringent list of banned ingredients for the products it stocks. It has managed to keep its stores and inventory from being commoditized by localizing each location and perpetuating the novel idea that a visit to the grocery store can be not only painless but also pleasant. At the San Francisco Market Street store, for example, you can check out the pop-up oyster-shucking station after you get your shoes shined. In Brooklyn you can enjoy a local craft brew on a rooftop bar next to a 20,000-square-foot greenhouse.

To be sure, Whole Foods has never been easy to love unconditionally, while rival Trader Joe's has secured an unabashed cult following. On one end of the spectrum, it has irritated the customer who couldn't care less about its animal-welfare standards and is peeved that she can't find Diet Coke; on the other end, plenty of Mackey's fellow vegans think he's a hypocrite for selling meat and dairy products. It has dropped popular brands, such as Chobani, causing consumers to scratch their heads. And Mackey, a vocal libertarian, has challenged the public's expectations of what a health-food CEO's politics should be.

But consumers flock to Whole Foods nonetheless -- to the tune of more than 7 million customer visits per week. And the chain enjoys a popularity and buzziness that previous "health food" stores never achieved. That's because Whole Foods preaches healthy eating but doesn't judge. It lets us feel good about the food we buy without forcing us to live an ascetic, fringe lifestyle. It makes flax seem less scary. Kevin Kelley, whose consultancy Shook Kelley has done work for Whole Foods, says the company embodies the idea of the "healthy indulgence." You can buy vegan cheese at Whole Foods, but you can also buy cheesecake. "They've changed how we think about food, our relationship with food, and our questions about food," Kelley says. Says co-CEO Mackey: "We've helped people to see what's possible, and re-envisioned what a supermarket is."

The precursor to the first Whole Foods was Safer Way, a health-food store that Mackey and his then-girlfriend ran out of a Victorian home in Austin. The store didn't sell meat, sugar, or caffeine -- a reflection of Mackey's food ethos at the time. "We were really hardcore, but we didn't do very much business," Mackey says. He knew he'd have to attract a broader base of customers if he wanted to run a real grocery store, not just be the food police. "The interesting thing about building a successful business is that you do help change things," he says. "But on the other hand, if you're not going the way people want to go, you won't be successful."

The idea that natural and organic foods were a healthier alternative was still countercultural when Mackey cofounded Whole Foods in 1980. The first store was a success by health-food standards, but it wasn't in the same league as a supermarket. He likes to tell the story of how one venture capitalist said, as he declined to invest, "I think you guys are just a bunch of hippies selling food to other hippies."

To expand, Whole Foods started buying up small natural-food chains, such as North Carolina's Wellspring Grocery, Bread & Circus out of New England, and Mrs. Gooch's in California. But when the company pursued Colorado-based Wild Oats in 2007, the Federal Trade Commission tried to block the acquisition. Whole Foods prevailed, but it was such a painful experience that management shifted more toward opening new stores rather than buying existing ones. Another lesson: Wild Oats had found success in smaller communities, which helped Whole Foods executives recognize the opportunity to peddle quinoa and organic Swiss chard in cities like Little Rock and Tulsa.

The real estate team has learned the hard way that some second-tier cities often have more potential than initially thought. The company picked a spot right in the center of town for its first, and what management thought would be its only, 50,000-square-foot store in Omaha. Now Whole Foods believes the market could support three locations there. But with one already right in the heart of the city, it's hard to figure out where to put the other two. So when securing a site in Des Moines, Whole Foods went for West Des Moines with the thought that the population could support another store on the other side of the metro area. "We're putting stores closer together than we ever thought possible," says Jim Sud, who heads up growth and business development. "We find that there's some initial cannibalization, but then we quickly recoup that, and the size of the overall market continues to grow." In January when the company launched its fifth location in the Austin area, its oldest market, the store had a record-breaking opening day despite being less than two miles from another site.

Traditional grocery principles don't always apply to Whole Foods, so it's had to create its own. Sud and his team at one time used a variation of the supermarket industry standard, the gravity model, to predict sales volumes when considering a new store. The gravity model takes into account all the grocery business done within a certain trade area and assumes a new store will gain a percentage from each competitor. But sales at new Whole Foods stores kept outstripping the gravity model's projections. "What we've found is Whole Foods creates volume that isn't really there," Sud explains. Now the company uses its own proprietary model.

The density of college graduates used to be the best indicator of whether an area's consciousness was ripe for a Whole Foods. While that's still true, "consciousness has gone beyond just being well-educated when it comes to healthy food," Mackey says. "Now I would say, give us enough population density in an area, and we'll get our share and we'll be successful. Detroit and New Orleans already proved that, and Newark and inner-city Chicago and some of the other markets we're looking at will just reaffirm that." Mackey still views Whole Foods as a niche retailer -- it's just that its niche has gotten bigger.

Even with a more accurate model for projecting sales volume, a Whole Foods in Detroit wasn't supposed to work. Analytically it made no sense. "I was definitely one of the most skeptical people," Mackey says. His co-CEO, Walter Robb, was the one who championed the Detroit store. Whole Foods is a purpose- driven company, and Robb wanted to explore how it could reach people who hadn't traditionally been seen as Whole Foods customers. "This criticism of organic food and natural food as being an elite thing, or only for some people, was really gnawing on me," he says.

Robb and Midwest regional president Michael Bashaw visited Detroit in June 2010 to check out the city's urban agriculture movement. Amanda Musilli, a native Detroiter and marketing team leader for the Michigan stores, showed them around, and afterward they asked her to start investigating the city's culinary scene. "Once we started to learn about Detroit," she says, "we saw people who were incredibly passionate about food." For Whole Foods it wasn't about creating a food movement in the city but about tapping into one that was already there. Musilli and her team canvassed churches and libraries, inviting people to discussions on a potential Detroit store. "We knew we had to take a new approach and be more inclusive in Detroit," she says. Dr. Akua Woolbright, a senior healthy-eating and wellness educator for Whole Foods, taught free classes on topics like combatting food cravings and decoding food labels. Often she wouldn't even mention her employer. (She's still teaching classes for free.)

A lot of Detroiters already knew Whole Foods and drove out to the suburbs to shop at its stores, but concerns lingered. Community members told Musilli and her team that they often got the poorer version of businesses. They felt that stores in Detroit weren't kept clean and that service was lacking in comparison with their counterparts around the state. They didn't want bulletproof glass or bag checks. They wanted a real Whole Foods.

Despite the city's seemingly endless vacancies, the team struggled to find the right site. Lots and existing buildings were often too small. Executives in the end decided to raze an old Chase bank to build a new 21,000-square-foot store (the company average is 38,000 square feet) in a revitalized part of the city near Wayne State University and the Detroit Medical Center. Building-design options were made public earlier in the process than normal so that the community could weigh in. Musilli hired buses to take Detroiters out to Whole Foods' suburban locations so that they'd have a better sense of pricing and possible features for their Whole Foods. (A smoothie bar got a resounding yes; Kale Kick-Start is the top seller.)

Since Michael Pollan criticized Whole Foods in The Omnivore's Dilemma for its lack of local product, the company has tried to bring smaller neighborhood businesses into its supplier mix. In the Detroit store you can find goods made by 30 different homegrown vendors. Whole Foods partnered with local bakery Avalon to supply half of the store's baked goods and selected it as a recipient of the company's local loan program to help build out its operations. A handful of suppliers were recruited from Eastern Market, a Detroit neighborhood that is home to a vibrant public bazaar. Among them: Spice Miser, which sells small packets of spices for 99¢, and dried fruit and nut purveyor Germack. Some would-be vendors tweaked their products to meet Whole Foods' quality standards: Water Station, about 10 minutes down the road, took the coral calcium (a salt of calcium) out of its alkaline water. Gluten-free goody maker Ethel's Edibles started using fruit without sulfites, cage-free eggs, and hormone-free dairy. Being in Whole Foods "has given us crazy credibility," says Ethel's founder and president, Jill Bommarito.

Despite the good feeling conjured by Whole Foods' entrance into the city, it's still a business endeavor. Executives decided to lower the margin structure and pricing for Detroit, but almost a year in, the store is exceeding expectations and is profitable. Its patterns follow the rest of the company's locations, which see about 30% of sales from organic products and 12% from Whole Foods' exclusive brands. Prepared foods are doing better than expected. The team has worked to highlight value, such as $5 Panini Thursdays and the bulk-foods section, where customers can buy only what they need. A shopping trip to a local grocery store reveals that prices at Whole Foods are comparable.

Robb believes that the Detroit store is one of the most meaningful things Whole Foods has ever done. But it has also taught the company a lot about how to serve broader areas -- about being more affordable and balancing quality and value. After the Detroit store opened, Robb says, Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel personally called him to ask Whole Foods to come to the South Side of his city. Newark is getting a Whole Foods in 2016, thanks in part to the lobbying efforts of New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker, who, as the city's mayor, told his staff it was the holy grail, the mark not of an area that was "coming back, but that had arrived." "Success in Detroit has a lot of implications for the company's growth into the future," Bashaw says. "This has caused us to rethink what's possible and question the assumptions that we've always made about the economic analysis."

The core competency of Whole Foods is, put very simply, food. That might seem a given for a grocery store, but most often it's not the case. Supermarkets are "wired for distribution and warehouse and logistics," says consultant Kevin Kelley, "not customers or a vision for food." Most chains try to carry everything anyone could possibly want, but Whole Foods has an opinion on what it should stock. "Great brands impose a view on you," Kelley says, and Whole Foods is no exception. "One of the faults that traditional groceries have is they believe the customer is always right."

Whole Foods has no problem telling the customer that the store knows best, and it has become skilled at using its scale to prod change. When the company started in 1980, it already had a mantra of no artificial colors, flavors, or preservatives. "That was a real change for shoppers -- to go into a store that they already knew had used that as a filter," says Margaret Wittenberg, the company's global vice president of quality standards. Today Whole Foods has a list of 78 banned ingredients, ranging from aspartame to foie gras to high-fructose corn syrup.

The company often uses its bully pulpit to influence suppliers. It demanded that its cleaning-supply vendors list on their packaging all ingredients, even though federal law does not mandate it. Similarly Whole Foods last year said it would require all its vendors to label products with GMOs by 2018, in part because, Wittenberg says, the U.S. Department of Agriculture had been dragging its feet on issuing rules about labeling. "We often ask this question: If we're not willing to do this, who's going to do it?" Mackey explains. "In a lot of these issues we take a leadership position because we don't see anybody else doing it." He adds with a laugh, "We take the heavy blows, and then if it works, people follow."

Indeed, as the organic movement has caught on, Whole Foods' competition has jumped on the bandwagon. Grocery powerhouse Kroger (KR, Fortune 500) has said that it's the second-largest seller of natural food -- after Whole Foods. Wal-Mart and Target (TGT, Fortune 500) offer a smattering of items once found only in health-food stores. In fact Whole Foods missed earnings forecasts in the most recent quarter and in part blamed increased competition.

Whole Foods is capitalizing on its existing organic cred as it expands its private-label 365 brand, which offers conventional and organic varieties. The brand is now available in nearly 2,000 stock-keeping units and is often the lowest-priced and bestselling item in a category. Customers traditionally have looked for organics on the perimeter of stores where fruits, vegetables, and meat are stocked. But the price and abundance of 365 products has encouraged customers to go organic when selecting packaged goods, says A.C. Gallo, Whole Foods' president and chief operating officer. This assortment of trusted "generics" has enhanced another of Whole Foods' growth strategies: converting casual shoppers -- those who come in for a few specialty items -- into hardcore regulars who make the majority of their food purchases at the store.

Whole Foods' takeover of America is hardly assured. While the 365 brand is easy, or at least easier, on the wallet, the view that Whole Foods is overpriced still lingers. The company lost major points on "price satisfaction" in a recent Consumer Reports supermarket ranking. Not that Whole Foods wants to go too far downmarket. Even as the company aims to reach different consumers and enter new territory, a big part of its luster comes from being an aspirational brand. ("This week, let's make homemade curry paste!") Perhaps the biggest risk is being a victim of its own success: Shoppers may get their first taste of kale chips, jicama, and kombucha at Whole Foods, and then go online to have those foods delivered via Amazon (AMZN, Fortune 500) or through outfits such as Fresh Direct, a New York-based company that does home delivery in five states. Hot web subscription service Blue Apron offers a prepackaged box of seasonal ingredients and recipes shipped to consumers' homes.

What the online competitors cannot replicate is the in-store extras that have turned Whole Foods into a destination. And that may be the company's biggest edge as it moves into smaller cities and underserved neighborhoods. Despite technology (or perhaps because of it), people are looking for places to congregate and share a common love of food. "Grocery shopping for the longest time was a chore people did, like taking out the garbage or doing the laundry -- something you had to do but something you didn't really look forward to, something you didn't enjoy," Mackey says. "That's completely the opposite of what food is. Think about it: Food, arguably, over our lifetimes, even more than sex, probably gives us more total pleasure in our lives than anything else, and yet people don't like to go to the grocery store. My gosh! Isn't that an interesting paradox?"

At the Detroit store, customers from all over the city come together to eat at the breakfast bar, check out the produce, and, yes, complain about the price of organic coconut oil, just as they would at any Whole Foods. A Whole Foods thriving in Detroit may be surprising, but there's nothing paradoxical about it.

This story is from the April 28, 2014 issue of Fortune. To top of page

First Published: April 9, 2014: 11:05 PM ET


14.44 | 0 komentar | Read More

College savings gap widens among rich and poor

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

Nearly three-quarters of families earning $100,000 a year or more are saving for college, while only 34% of families earning less than $35,000 are putting anything away, according to a report released by Sallie Mae and market research firm Ipsos Thursday.

Among those who are saving for college, average balances grew by 30% to an average $15,346, fueled by increased contributions and, in some cases, stock market gains, according to a report released by Sallie Mae and market research firm Ipsos Thursday.

Related: 529 college savings hits record high

But the higher balances were predominantly enjoyed by mid- and high-income families, many of whom said they were able to save more because their income had increased.

"Middle-income and higher-income families have come out of the recession. They've adjusted their behavior, they're more optimistic and they're starting to save again," said Cliff Young, managing director at Ipsos.

Meanwhile, the average college savings balance of low-income parents fell 26% to $3,762 — a mere fraction of the amount saved by wealthier families (see chart).

The majority of those who aren't saving said they simply don't have the extra money.

Many of these families still haven't recovered from the recession. The survey found that only 51% of families with children under the age of 18 are saving for college, compared to 62% in 2009.

Related: Colleges with the best bang for your buck

At the same time, the cost of college costs continues to rise. Average costs for tuition, fees, room and board at a public university rose 3% to $18,391 this school year, while private college costs averaged more than $40,000, according to the College Board.

The most common college savings vehicle cited -- especially by lower income families -- was a basic savings account, which typically earns a meager return of less than 1%.

Meanwhile, nearly 20% of savers said they were using retirement accounts to save for college. And 29% said they were putting money into a 529 prepaid tuition or savings plan, which allows account holders to invest and use the earnings tax-free for qualified education expenses, like tuition, fees and room and board. To top of page

First Published: April 10, 2014: 12:07 AM ET


14.44 | 0 komentar | Read More

Get married, save on car insurance

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

According to a report from insuranceQuotes.com, a 20-year old married woman pays an average of 22% less for car insurance than her single counterpart. And a married 20-year-old man pays 20% less than his single friend of the same age.

Your gender and age also significantly affect how much you pay, the report found.

As people mature, gain experience and take on more responsibilities, they become safer drivers, Mike Barry, a spokesman for the Insurance Information Institute, says.

Age is the biggest factor. At age 20, a single male driver will pay 49% more than a single man who is 25, insuranceQuote.com's report found. An unmarried woman will pay 39% more at age 20 than at age 25.

Related: Slow down! A ticket hikes up your insurance

The lowest premiums are charged to drivers at age 60. After that, premiums start to creep up again. By the time a single man is 75, for example, he's paying 20% more than a single man at age 60.

Gender discounts are not as large, but insurers do charge women much less than men during the first years they're on the road.

A 20-year-old woman pays 19% less than a man the same age. By the time they're both 25, the gender difference drops to 4% and narrows through age 30. After that, men pay slightly lower premiums.

Related: Coolest cars under $25K

"Insurers price their policies to reflect the claims risk," said Barry. "They look at claims filings and arrive at conclusions as to who is likely to file more -- and more expensive -- claims."

Shopping around can help cut costs, according to Adams.

"In addition to regularly comparing at least three quotes from different insurers, consumers should review potential discounts with their current insurer," she said. "This is even more important for younger drivers because they tend to pay the highest rates."

Students who carry a "B" average or better may qualify for discounts of up to 20%, depending on their carrier, she said. They can also reduce their premiums by raising the deductible they pay.

Related: 5 things to know about umbrella insurance

An additional discount may be available via "pay as you drive" programs, said Adams. These use hardware that transmits to insurers information about your driving habits. That can include how much you drive, how fast, and how hard you brake or take turns.

InsuranceQuotes.com and Quadrant Information Services calculated the impacts of gender, age and marital status on car insurance premiums using data from the largest carriers in each U.S. state and the District of Columbia. It noted that Hawaii is the only state that doesn't allow insurers to set rates based on age or gender. To top of page

First Published: April 10, 2014: 12:17 AM ET


14.44 | 0 komentar | Read More

When Wall Street becomes a landlord

Written By limadu on Rabu, 09 April 2014 | 14.44

real estate investing

Housing investors are flipping foreclosures into single-family rentals.

(Money Magazine)

Nowhere has that been truer than in the suburbs ringing Atlanta, where rampant overbuilding and economic woes produced a flood of foreclosures.

At the same time, the local rental market couldn't absorb all the displaced owners. That combination proved irresistible to mom-and-pop investors, whose all-cash purchases stabilized the market: Atlanta home prices rebounded from a 12.7% decline in 2009 to flat in 2010.

Related: Cities where the real estate deals are

Then Wall Street came to town. This second wave of housing investors is spending billions to flip foreclosures into single-family rentals. In January one in every four homes sold in Atlanta went to a large investor, four times the national average, says RealtyTrac.

"They're coming from all over, even out of the country," says Atlanta agent and property manager Scott Goeber.

In June 2012 the Atlanta office of real estate manager Waypoint Homes was "me and my cellphone," says regional director David Zanaty. By last fall he had hired 50 people and bought 600 homes, and hoped to own 1,500 by March.

Large investors are swarming local markets. Real estate powerhouse Blackstone has spent $8 billion to buy 43,000 homes nationwide. American Homes 4 Rent has spent $3.5 billion on 21,700 homes.

Now these buying sprees are being converted to investments.

Since December 2012, four single-family home real estate investment trusts, similar to REITs that own apartment buildings or shopping centers, have opened up to individual investors. American Homes 4 Rent's (AMH) is the largest; most recently Waypoint merged with the home-rental division of Starwood Property to form Starwood Waypoint Residential Trust (SWAY), a REIT that owns close to 5,800 homes.

Plus, a new breed of bonds, which bundle rents from single-family homes, is being peddled to institutional investors, such as pension managers or mutual funds. Last October, Blackstone rolled out a $479 million bond backed by 3,207 homes in five states. Deutsche Bank estimates that another $5 billion in home rental bonds will hit the market this year.

So far investors have not been enthusiastic. Some of Blackstone's bonds are selling below the offer price, and most of the REITs have underperformed their index. The business model is too new, says Brad Thomas, editor of iREIT Investor.

The biggest firms expect to generate 5% to 7% a year in return from rents, according to a Bank of America report. But that hinges on keeping down the cost of maintaining far-flung homes.

"If a toilet breaks, you've got to send someone to fix it," Thomas says. "It's difficult to do that efficiently. In an apartment complex, a property manager can walk the building."

Related: Dreary outlook for formerly hot housing markets

And REIT investors shouldn't count on big price gains. "It's unproven how their asset value will grow in a more normal market," says Forward Real Estate Long/Short manager Ian Goltra.

Plus, the REITs have been plowing capital into buying homes, not paying big dividends. And yield is a big reason to own REITs, notes Goltra. Top apartment REITs currently pay more than 4%. The highest available yield in a single-family rental REIT is 1.2%.

"It's early days," says Goltra. "For now, they're too risky." To top of page

First Published: April 8, 2014: 5:23 PM ET


14.44 | 0 komentar | Read More
techieblogger.com Techie Blogger Techie Blogger